<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I believe in Open Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/</link>
	<description>People, places and ICT</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Stephen - thanks so much for this contribution and for the Goldcorp link (&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ks588)." rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2ks588).&lt;/a&gt; I am right with you on the incentives and rewards. Any system or process, online or offline, that doesn't consider personal motivations to share and collaborate is doomed to fail. As you say, rewards can range from financial to emotional, but some sort of reward needs to be there for an individual to commit their time, let alone their ideas to a collaborative effort . . . I've marked your blog at &lt;a href="http://www.dubstudios.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.dubstudios.com/&lt;/a&gt; as one to keep an eye on!
Simon
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen - thanks so much for this contribution and for the Goldcorp link (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ks588)." rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ks588" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2ks588</a>). I am right with you on the incentives and rewards. Any system or process, online or offline, that doesn&#8217;t consider personal motivations to share and collaborate is doomed to fail. As you say, rewards can range from financial to emotional, but some sort of reward needs to be there for an individual to commit their time, let alone their ideas to a collaborative effort . . . I&#8217;ve marked your blog at <a href="http://www.dubstudios.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dubstudios.com/</a> as one to keep an eye on!<br />
Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen cribbett</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen cribbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Simon,
What your comment failed to mention, and that which is essential to successful open-innovation and collaboration, are the incentives and rewards the community receives when sharing their wisdom. By nature, people will happily collaborate given both social and emotional reward. For example, Lego-isters joined forces with Lego to raise their social standing amongst the Lego community and to be viewed as authorities. Similarly, employees will participate because it gives them, amongst other things, a voice. The more 'valuable' the reward, the greater and more relevant the effort and subsequent offering. Insecurities around 'sharing' information are commonplace, but as you say, the rewards are far greater. Another great case study is Goldcorp which you can access here &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ks588" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2ks588&lt;/a&gt;
Stephen
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon,<br />
What your comment failed to mention, and that which is essential to successful open-innovation and collaboration, are the incentives and rewards the community receives when sharing their wisdom. By nature, people will happily collaborate given both social and emotional reward. For example, Lego-isters joined forces with Lego to raise their social standing amongst the Lego community and to be viewed as authorities. Similarly, employees will participate because it gives them, amongst other things, a voice. The more &#8216;valuable&#8217; the reward, the greater and more relevant the effort and subsequent offering. Insecurities around &#8217;sharing&#8217; information are commonplace, but as you say, the rewards are far greater. Another great case study is Goldcorp which you can access here <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ks588" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2ks588</a><br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hamman</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hamman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Sun Microsystems takes a pretty enlightened approach to their staff blogging:

&lt;a href="http://www.cybersoc.com/2007/06/staff_blogs_at_.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cybersoc.com/2007/06/staff_blogs_at_.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun Microsystems takes a pretty enlightened approach to their staff blogging:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cybersoc.com/2007/06/staff_blogs_at_.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybersoc.com/2007/06/staff_blogs_at_.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Excellent stuff, now mentioned over here &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/2op332." rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/2op332.&lt;/a&gt; I think you should form a club for naked CEOs:-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent stuff, now mentioned over here <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2op332." rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/2op332" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2op332</a>. I think you should form a club for naked CEOs:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Even Microsoft are at it - &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-21ExpandInteroperabilityPR.mspx?rss_fdn=Press%20Releases" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-21ExpandInteroperabilityPR.mspx?rss_fdn=Press%20Releases&lt;/a&gt; the faint sound of hell freezing over is getting a little louder...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Microsoft are at it - <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-21ExpandInteroperabilityPR.mspx?rss_fdn=Press%20Releases" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-21ExpandInteroperabilityPR.mspx?rss_fdn=Press%20Releases</a> the faint sound of hell freezing over is getting a little louder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Nardelli</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Nardelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/02/21/why-i-believe-in-open-innovation/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>This is a great post! The paradox is that GM is one of the worst examples of innovation, and this is clearly reflected in its numbers: &lt;a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GM" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GM&lt;/a&gt; .

Lego story is such a fantastic example of crowdsourcing :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post! The paradox is that GM is one of the worst examples of innovation, and this is clearly reflected in its numbers: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GM" rel="nofollow">http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GM</a> .</p>
<p>Lego story is such a fantastic example of crowdsourcing <img src='http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
