<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are &#8216;tags&#8217; the new &#8216;groups&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/01/20/are-tags-the-new-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/01/20/are-tags-the-new-groups/</link>
	<description>People, places and ICT</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tags are not the new groups &#187; textgoeshere</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/01/20/are-tags-the-new-groups/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Tags are not the new groups &#187; textgoeshere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/01/20/are-tags-the-new-groups/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] Berry of Ruralnet raises this question when he asks, &#34;Are tags the new groups?&#34; A provocative question (hattip [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Berry of Ruralnet raises this question when he asks, &quot;Are tags the new groups?&quot; A provocative question (hattip [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
