<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communities of Practice and Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2007/12/11/communities-of-practice-and-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2007/12/11/communities-of-practice-and-web-20/</link>
	<description>People, places and ICT</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2007/12/11/communities-of-practice-and-web-20/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2007/12/11/communities-of-practice-and-web-20/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Ed and for the link. Re your point 2, this what I was trying get across to the ruralnet&#124;uk team yesterday and your comment is a very timely demo of what I was telling them about getting your ideas online.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Ed and for the link. Re your point 2, this what I was trying get across to the ruralnet|uk team yesterday and your comment is a very timely demo of what I was telling them about getting your ideas online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2007/12/11/communities-of-practice-and-web-20/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2007/12/11/communities-of-practice-and-web-20/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Good thoughts; keep them coming. I have been musing upon this for a while and have a couple of things to add:

1. I think you are talking about what I term a 'distributed' community? More here:
&lt;a href="http://www.edmitchell.co.uk/blog/2007/11/16/three-types-of-community/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.edmitchell.co.uk/blog/2007/11/16/three-types-of-community/&lt;/a&gt;

We worked on this model with Amnesty in June 2007 and have seen it gaining traction since.

2. The key has to be the ongoing aggregation of our distributed thoughts on our blogs by interest/practice focused hubs which gather our thoughts and then, when neccesary, we can come to the communal knowledge watering hole and kick off in small focused bursts around specific issues...

This gives us the independence we want when we want it and the communal many brains focus when we need it...

We must start using effective keywords and experimenting properly between ourselves!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts; keep them coming. I have been musing upon this for a while and have a couple of things to add:</p>
<p>1. I think you are talking about what I term a &#8216;distributed&#8217; community? More here:<br />
<a href="http://www.edmitchell.co.uk/blog/2007/11/16/three-types-of-community/" rel="nofollow">http://www.edmitchell.co.uk/blog/2007/11/16/three-types-of-community/</a></p>
<p>We worked on this model with Amnesty in June 2007 and have seen it gaining traction since.</p>
<p>2. The key has to be the ongoing aggregation of our distributed thoughts on our blogs by interest/practice focused hubs which gather our thoughts and then, when neccesary, we can come to the communal knowledge watering hole and kick off in small focused bursts around specific issues&#8230;</p>
<p>This gives us the independence we want when we want it and the communal many brains focus when we need it&#8230;</p>
<p>We must start using effective keywords and experimenting properly between ourselves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
